Skip to content
Home » Tennis » Petrovic, Andreja vs Batyutenko, Max

Petrovic, Andreja vs Batyutenko, Max

Expert Analysis: Petrovic vs Batyutenko

This upcoming tennis match between Andreja Petrovic and Max Batyutenko is generating considerable interest. With Petrovic’s aggressive baseline play and Batyutenko’s versatile all-court game, this encounter promises to be an exciting one. The betting odds suggest a closely contested match, with significant probabilities for various outcomes. Let’s delve into the predictions for each betting line.

Petrovic, Andreja

WLLLL
-

Batyutenko, Max

LLLLL
Date: 2025-08-12
Time: 12:30
Venue: Not Available Yet

First Set Predictions

  • Under 1st Set Games (98.70%): The odds indicate a high likelihood that the first set will have fewer than 9 games. Both players have shown tendencies to dominate their opponents early, leading to shorter sets.
  • Tie Break in 1st Set (No) (98.20%): There’s a strong chance that the first set will be decided without a tie-break, suggesting one player might pull ahead significantly before reaching the critical point.
  • Over 1st Set Games (72.90%): While less likely than the under, there is still a reasonable chance for the first set to extend beyond 9 games, especially if both players are evenly matched.

Match Predictions

  • Tie Break in Match (No) (82.90%): The probability suggests that one player could potentially win a set outright without requiring a tie-break, indicating decisive performance in at least one set.
  • Under 2.5 Sets (77.80%): A two-set match seems likely, with one player likely dominating and closing out the match quickly.

Total Games Predictions

  • Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) (57.60%): There’s a moderate chance that the total number of games across all sets will be fewer than 22, pointing towards swift victories in individual sets.
  • Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) (60.90%): This prediction aligns closely with the three-way option but allows for slightly more games, indicating a tight contest but still favoring quick conclusions.