Expert Analysis: Wang, Jiaqi vs Kim, Dabin
As tennis enthusiasts in South Africa, we’re set to witness an exciting clash between Wang, Jiaqi and Kim, Dabin on the 13th of August, 2025. This match promises to deliver high-quality tennis with both players bringing unique strengths to the court. Wang, known for her aggressive baseline play and powerful serves, is likely to push Kim into defensive positions. On the other hand, Kim’s agility and tactical prowess could turn the tide in close rallies. The match is scheduled for an early morning start at 03:30, setting the stage for a thrilling encounter.
Wang, Jiaqi
Kim, Dabin
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 72.10% | ||
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 97.30% | ||
| Under 1st Set Games | 57.80% | ||
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 95.30% | ||
| Under 2.5 Sets | 66.00% | ||
| Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 63.60% | ||
| Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 50.80% |
Betting Predictions
Set Dynamics
Given the current form and playing styles, the likelihood of a high number of games in the first set is significant. The prediction for “Over 1st Set Games” stands at 74.40%, suggesting a closely contested first set. Conversely, “Under 1st Set Games” is less favored at 55.10%. The possibility of a tie break in the first set is low, with a probability of 97.30% for no tie break occurring.
Match Overview
The match is expected to be competitive but not excessively lengthy. “Under 2.5 Sets” is predicted at 67.10%, indicating that while there might be some extended sets, a quick conclusion in three sets is more probable than not. The absence of a tie break in the entire match is also favored at 92.70%, hinting at decisive sets.
Total Games Prediction
For those considering bets on total games, “Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)” holds a probability of 59.20%, suggesting that the match could conclude with fewer than 22 games overall. Meanwhile, “Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)” stands at a slightly lower probability of 50.40%, indicating a balanced expectation on either side.